Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing education, with LLM-based agents playing a key role in simulating student behavior. A major challenge in student simulation is modeling the diverse learning patterns of students at various cognitive levels. However, current LLMs, typically trained as ``helpful assistants'', target at generating perfect responses. As a result, they struggle to simulate students with diverse cognitive abilities, as they often produce overly advanced answers, missing the natural imperfections that characterize student learning and resulting in unrealistic simulations. To address this issue, we propose a training-free framework for student simulation. We begin by constructing a cognitive prototype for each student using a knowledge graph, which captures their understanding of concepts from past learning records. This prototype is then mapped to new tasks to predict student performance. Next, we simulate student solutions based on these predictions and iteratively refine them using a beam search method to better replicate realistic mistakes. To validate our approach, we construct the \texttt{Student\_100} dataset, consisting of $100$ students working on Python programming and $5,000$ learning records. Experimental results show that our method consistently outperforms baseline models, achieving $100\%$ improvement in simulation accuracy.

We introduce Behavior from Language and Demonstration (BLADE), a framework for long-horizon robotic manipulation by integrating imitation learning and model-based planning. BLADE leverages language-annotated demonstrations, extracts abstract action knowledge from large language models (LLMs), and constructs a library of structured, high-level action representations. These representations include preconditions and effects grounded in visual perception for each high-level action, along with corresponding controllers implemented as neural network-based policies. BLADE can recover such structured representations automatically, without manually labeled states or symbolic definitions. BLADE shows significant capabilities in generalizing to novel situations, including novel initial states, external state perturbations, and novel goals. We validate the effectiveness of our approach both in simulation and on real robots with a diverse set of objects with articulated parts, partial observability, and geometric constraints.

Multimodal reasoning, an area of artificial intelligence that aims at make inferences from multimodal signals such as vision, language and speech, has drawn more and more attention in recent years. People with different personalities may respond differently to the same situation. However, such individual personalities were ignored in the previous studies. In this work, we introduce a new Personality-aware Human-centric Multimodal Reasoning (Personality-aware HMR) task, and accordingly construct a new dataset based on The Big Bang Theory television shows, to predict the behavior of a specific person at a specific moment, given the multimodal information of its past and future moments. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was annotated and utilized in the task to represent individuals' personalities. We benchmark the task by proposing three baseline methods, two were adapted from the related tasks and one was newly proposed for our task. The experimental results demonstrate that personality can effectively improve the performance of human-centric multimodal reasoning. To further solve the lack of personality annotation in real-life scenes, we introduce an extended task called Personality-predicted HMR, and propose the corresponding methods, to predict the MBTI personality at first, and then use the predicted personality to help multimodal reasoning. The experimental results show that our method can accurately predict personality and achieves satisfactory multimodal reasoning performance without relying on personality annotations.

To effectively work with AI aids, people need to know when to either accept or override an AI's output. People decide when to rely on an AI by using their mental models [3, 30], or internal representations, of how the AI tends to behave: when it is most accurate, when it is most likely to fail, etc. A detailed and accurate mental model allows a person to effectively complement an AI system by appropriately relying [37] on its output, while an overly simple or wrong mental model can lead to blind spots and systematic failures [3, 8]. At worst, people can perform worse than they would have unassisted, such as clinicians who made more errors than average when shown incorrect AI predictions [7, 24]. Mental models are an inherently incomplete representation of any system, but numerous factors make it especially challenging to develop adequate mental models of AI systems. First, modern AI systems are often black-box models for which humans cannot see how or why the model made a prediction [54].